Yackety-yack-yack-yacking about being fat and a bunch of other shit, too.
09 December 2007
Help me decide, Part 3
Sorry, just one more possible wedding dress before I resume regular posting on this blog!
What do you think of this one? I'm not super stoked on the rhinestones but I could make them work. I just think it's a cute dress and would look cute on me.
3 comments:
Anonymous
said...
I have mixed feelings about this one. I agree it would look cute on you, but I don't know if cute is really the look you are going for. I think the other choices are more sophisticated. I am actually now leaning towards the Wtoo #532; I like the empire waist and the chiffon, and I really think it would do you justice. And finally, I can't help being a little skeezed out by the rhinestones; they're just a little too cowgirl for my taste. Harumph. I really feel like I can't help long-distance - a wedding planning/shopping trip is in order, methinks!
Yeah, I know... I have all those same concerns as well! There are some really major problems with being zaftig, on a budget, and looking at "older" Watters and Wtoo designs. No one has these "older" styles in stock so I can see them in person. Not that I can try them on anyhow... they only come as sample size 6. If you order one, it takes 4 months to get to you and the sale is *final*. By that time, you can't get another if you hate it and you've just dropped $300-400 on the dress. So, I tend to gravitate towards the dresses that I can buy and try on and that aren't final sales such as the one from this post. My gawd, I'm going to go crazy with this shit!
Hmmm. Yes, high skeeze factor indeed. I like only a few things about this last dress.
I second Shasta. I'm veering towards the Wtoo #532. It's elegant and cute. It's a little more mature than the Marisol, which is now looking a little too stiff and wholesome, with birds chirping in the background.
3 comments:
I have mixed feelings about this one. I agree it would look cute on you, but I don't know if cute is really the look you are going for. I think the other choices are more sophisticated. I am actually now leaning towards the Wtoo #532; I like the empire waist and the chiffon, and I really think it would do you justice. And finally, I can't help being a little skeezed out by the rhinestones; they're just a little too cowgirl for my taste. Harumph. I really feel like I can't help long-distance - a wedding planning/shopping trip is in order, methinks!
Yeah, I know... I have all those same concerns as well! There are some really major problems with being zaftig, on a budget, and looking at "older" Watters and Wtoo designs. No one has these "older" styles in stock so I can see them in person. Not that I can try them on anyhow... they only come as sample size 6. If you order one, it takes 4 months to get to you and the sale is *final*. By that time, you can't get another if you hate it and you've just dropped $300-400 on the dress. So, I tend to gravitate towards the dresses that I can buy and try on and that aren't final sales such as the one from this post. My gawd, I'm going to go crazy with this shit!
Hmmm. Yes, high skeeze factor indeed. I like only a few things about this last dress.
I second Shasta. I'm veering towards the Wtoo #532. It's elegant and cute. It's a little more mature than the Marisol, which is now looking a little too stiff and wholesome, with birds chirping in the background.
Post a Comment